All Research vrcapital.co.in
VR Capital
Nifty 500 · Closing Note · 20 May 2026
Rooted in quality. Powered by patience.

The market is cheap
where it matters.

The Nifty 500 closed at 22,578, eight percent below the September 2024 peak and trading at 22.2× trailing earnings. That is the second cheapest print of the past five years. History pays 19% to 24% over the following twelve months from this multiple. The note that follows answers three questions in order: why price and P/E fell when they did, what forward returns the data suggests from here, and how twenty quality compounders would carry a 20% IRR.

22,578
Index level
+0.25% on the day
22.2×
Trailing P/E
Median 5Y · 24.0×
7.8%
Below ATH
24,497 · Sep 2024
12.1%
5Y CAGR
1Y · 1.25% decline
01 · What the market told us

The drops, in context.

Two real drawdowns shape the cycle. The 2022 Russia and Fed episode took 18% off the index. The 2024 to 2025 election, FII and tariff episode took another 19%. Both compressed P/E by four to eight turns. Both were followed by re‑rating once the catalyst cleared. The current 21 to 22× window sits squarely in that re‑rate zone.

Nifty 500 · Index price with 50 and 200‑day moving averages
Annotated catalysts. Drag to zoom. Double click to reset.
Nifty 500 · Trailing P/E (reconstructed)
Anchored to dated readings from the constituent screener. Jun 2021 · 31.2 to today · 22.2. Median 24.0×.
Nifty 500 · Drawdown from running peak
Two structural 18% and 19% events. Everything else recovered inside two months.
"India equities corrected meaningfully twice in five years. Once on Ukraine and the Fed. Once on election, FII and tariff. Both troughs printed P/E inside 20 to 22 times. Both were followed by double digit returns." Lens · drawdown postmortem
02 · What history pays for waiting

Forward returns are earned, not predicted.

Every trading day of the last four and a half years is grouped by starting P/E. The realised one‑year, two‑year and three‑year forward annualised returns from each bucket make the cycle's lesson literal. The cheap buckets paid in the high teens to mid twenties. The expensive bucket paid nothing. Today sits at the rich edge of the second cheapest bucket.

Forward annualised return by starting P/E
Mean realised annualised return across all days in the bucket. 1Y has the largest sample. 3Y has the fewest given the 4½‑year history.
By the numbers
P/E bucketn days1Y2YHit rate

Today's 22.2 sits inside the 21 to 23 bucket. 19.3% mean one‑year forward. 47% hit rate above zero. 24.6% two‑year annualised.

03 · Where we hunt

The quality compounder screen.

A blended screen across the full Nifty 500. Traditional factors filter for durable economics and conservative balance sheets. Novel factors test free cash quality, alignment and absence of price weakness. Cyclicals are removed because their three‑year ROCE reflects the cycle, not the franchise.

Traditional factors

  • ROE ≥ 15%, ROCE ≥ 18%
  • 3Y avg ROCE ≥ 15%, 10Y avg ROE ≥ 15%
  • Debt to equity ≤ 0.6
  • 3Y sales growth ≥ 8%
  • P/E between 0 and 60

Novel factors

  • 10 year cumulative FCF yield (Σ FCF ÷ market cap)
  • Price to free cash flow
  • Promoter holding as alignment proxy
  • 12 month price momentum to avoid falling knives
  • Composite weights · Quality 35, Growth 20, Value 20, Novel 15, Alignment 5, Momentum 5
# Name M‑cap (₹Cr) P/E ROE % ROCE % Sales 3Y Profit gr. D/E Score

Top 50 of 159 names that passed the base quality filter. Composite is a z‑score blend. Positive scores sit above the universe mean. Twenty are taken forward.

04 · How we would put it to work

Twenty names for the next five years.

A sector agnostic, conviction weighted book of twenty compounders. Three names per industry maximum. Sizing follows a gentle 1 over root rank decay, floored at 3% and capped at 8%. Expected IRR uses Damodaran's earnings decomposition. Organic earnings growth plus dividend yield plus modest re‑rating toward a 28× quality cohort multiple.

24.3%
Portfolio expected IRR · 3 to 5Y
19.7%
Earnings growth contribution
1.6%
Dividend contribution
3.0%
Re‑rating contribution
25.0×
Weighted P/E
39.7%
Weighted ROCE
IRR build · contribution by name
Earnings growth, dividend yield and re‑rating stacked. Sum equals expected IRR per holding.
Sector concentration
Sector agnostic with a soft cap of three names per industry.
# Holding Wt % P/E ROE % ROCE % 10Y ROE D/E Sales 3Y Div Y Growth Div Re‑rate IRR
"At 22.2× the index is asking permission to compound. Twenty businesses with mid twenties ROCE, low debt, double digit growth and reasonable multiples carry the asymmetry. Patience does the rest." Portfolio thesis
05 · What this is and isn't

Honest caveats.

What this is

A repeatable, data driven, sector agnostic blend of traditional quality, value and growth factors with a few novel signals. The expected IRR build is mechanically derived from each company's reported ROE, growth, payout and current multiple. Forward return statistics use the last 4½ years of daily P/E reconstructed from anchor points in the constituent screener.

What it isn't

Not a recommendation to buy. Twenty percent IRR is uncommon for a reason. The build assumes the next three to five years roughly resemble the last ten in operating quality, modest re‑rating of the cheapest names toward 28×, and no permanent impairment. Position sizing should reflect personal risk tolerance. A real allocation replaces these screen numbers with primary source diligence on each name.